18 August 2007

Monbiot On Climate Camp Rumours

People can't defend the indefensible -- expanding aviation to ensure that Britian misses carbon reduction targets -- so the response is to smear.

Where did the story [on hoax bombs to cause alerts and assaults on the Heathrow fence] come from? It was, or so the byline claimed, written by Robert Mendick, the Evening Standard's chief reporter. One of the campers phoned Mr Mendick and asked him what was going on.

"I'm very constrained about what I can say for various reasons," Mr Mendick replied. "Suffice to say I understand what you're saying and I can't go into it. Er, and I would further say it's, er, not something I was actually massively involved with and, er, I'll leave it at that." "What do you mean?" "... I really can't go into it."

So what does he mean? Why is Mr Mendick unable to say where the claims in his story came from? How did he manage to write an article that he was not "massively involved with"? Is there a computer programme at the Evening Standard that composes reporters' articles on their behalf?

No comments: