11 August 2008

New APMS "Super-Surgeries" For Coventry

Scrutiny Board 4 of Coventry City Council has decided to support the idea of APMS contracts for three new GP surgeries in Coventry.

Scrunity Board 4 is reponsible for looking at policy surrounding community services, health, culture, leisure, libraries, and neighbourhoods/community safety. You can see more information on its membership and upcoming meetings here.

Under APMS (Alternative Providers of Medical Services) contracts, potential bidders - private companies, the voluntary sector or GPs - will be invited to run each surgery on a three-year contract.

The Coventry Telegraph reports:

The Local Medical Committee (LMC), which represents city GPs, is vehemently opposed to the "commercial-isation of general practice". It was represented at the meeting by secretary Dr Jamie Macpherson who warned that the cash came with "strings attached", in the form of multinational companies looking to make a profit. Socialist Cllr Rob Windsor raised concerns about some of the multi-nationals who could be potential bidders for the new Coventry surgeries. He said: "Inviting them in would be like inviting dingos to run a sheep farm. Let's have a proper look at these companies or we could see them denying healthcare to certain people."
You can take a look at the report from the committee here (6th August 2008).

A number of interesting things upon close reading of the report:

1) The Scrutiny Board decided that:

"to suggest that general practice in its current form is somehow fundamentally different to general practice provided by a consortium of GPs, or even a private healthcare company, is generally not credible."

For the committee, for-profit healthcare is the same as GPs in their current form. Hands-up, who agrees with that? For-profit healthcare means that more profitable procedures/patients will get priority, rather than what local health necessarily needs.

2) The chair, Joe Clifford (Lab - Holbrooks) is the only member to attend all the meetings/visits/briefings listed at the end. The deputy chair, Altaf Adalat (Con - Foleshill), didn't attend any of them.

3) The committee disagreed (page 10 of the report) with both the Local Medical Committee, as well as local pharmacists (The Local Pharmaceutical Committee).

12. The LMC identified what it saw as the following general flaws:

- The APMS contract creates a business-based, profit-driven approach to health care, at the expense of the existing GPs’ service-based, patient-centred approach – Dr Wells, Vice-Chair of the LMC suggested that the new contracts might be "the end of general practice as I know it".
- Short term contracts interrupt continuity of care and the GP’s role as a patient advocate
- The procurement process creates barriers to entry for GPs, notably the significant cost of preparing a credible bid
- GPs are not, in isolation, an effective response to health inequalities
- The risk that new entrants will either destabilise existing general practice provision, or fail and leave the market, thereby wasting tax payers’ money, with the additional risk that damage to health care provision in the locality will already have been done
- There are fears for the terms and conditions of salaried GPs, and questions about the quality of the practitioners
- Private contractors will offer diagnostic services and undermine their provision at
University Hospital Walsgrave

13. The LMC’s overall view is that the existing GP contracts, the General Medical Services (GMS) contract, and Personal Medical Services (PMS) contracts are the appropriate means by which new services should be introduced.

14. The Local Pharmaceutical Committee (LPC), which represents the city’s pharmacists, came to a similar view. The LPC saw considerable risk and potential destabilisation of the provision of community pharmacy, if there was turbulence in general practice. The pharmacists feared the new practices would include so-called "100 hour" pharmacies which are exempt from the control of entry regulations. The LPC feared that these new co-located pharmacies could put existing pharmacies out of business, and reduce the provision of "High Street" community pharmacy.

4 comments:

sarah said...

I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I don't know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often.

Sarah

http://www.thetreadmillguide.com

uhfdf said...

香港女星寫真,a片分享,美女色情裸體,台灣kiss情色貼圖,美腿圖,正妹,日本情色網,情色卡通下載,免費下載的做愛照片,線上a片免費看,tube影片,情色成人,ro 私服論壇,色情網,aaa片免費看短片分享區,日本人妻熟女自拍貼圖,蕃薯論壇,台灣網友自拍貼照,嘟嘟成人網,狂插漂亮美眉,8591論壇,女同志聊天室,人妻俱樂部網站,背包客棧論壇,成人性感內衣,看美女脫光光,黑澀會美眉無名,色咪咪貼影片,無碼a片,aa片免費看,免費線上觀看a片,做愛的圖片,色情漫畫,性感卡通美女圖片,香港a片,自拍,情色圖書館,plus 28 論壇,1007視訊,熟女自拍照,苗栗人聊天室,黑澀會美眉即時通,jp成人,色情,aaaaa片俱樂部,情侶歡愉用品,

okav成人影院,網友裸體自拍,交友ukiss,娘家影片,a片免費,黑澀會美眉即時通,人妻性交俱樂部,聊天室尋夢園,18禁,情色性感美女圖片,美女短片免費試看,3級女星寫真,情色短片論壇,摯愛中年聊天室,美腿貼圖,影音聊天,聊天室找一夜,g世代論壇,免費線上影片,淫蕩少女,火辣美眉自拍寫真貼圖,內衣寫真秀,美少女自拍,aa片免費看影片,麗的情色,gogo2sex,aooyy 成人玩具,台灣成人網,素人自拍,

opop said...

網路交友,av 女優,a圖a片,av383影音城,小高聊天室,台灣18成人,苗栗人聊天室,貼影區,正妹帶回家,18禁遊戲區,真情寫真,嘟嘟成人,台灣自拍,丁字褲美女寫真,1007視訊,裸體美女,玩弄旗袍美女遊戲,寫真集美女,777美女圖,真實自拍,台灣自拍,080聊天網,情色武俠,美腿工坊,影音部落格,aaa片免費看,0204成人片,ut女同聊天室,視訊辣妹,a片免費,人妻自拍,免費線上a片,上班族聊天室,18禁,熊貓貼圖區,aa片免費看,女優盒子,18禁區,ol美腿,777成人區,視訊美女,聊天室,自拍走光,a片試看,18禁卡通,美樂蒂情色網,台灣a片,

18禁漫畫,脫衣遊戲,免費a片觀賞,情色成人,丁字褲美女圖,視訊交友網,辣妹賓團,性愛自拍,小弟弟貼影片,潮吹影片,自拍圖貼,69成人,自拍網,線上看,家庭教師影片,免費a片線上看,正妹帶回家,聊天室入口,小莉影音像館,69成人,免費視訊辣妹,美女牆,小魔女免費影片,成人自拍,情色卡通,偷拍貼圖,線上影片,摸摸扣扣同學會聊天室,原住民聊天室,日本美女寫真集,情色聊天室,美女交友,情色成人,a片免費,影片分享,正妹日報,熊貓貼圖,美女寫真,無名強力正妹牆,性愛影片,0204 貼圖區,免費視訊辣妹脫衣秀,情色電影,兔女郎貼影區,自拍貼圖區,完美女人,熟女人影片,性愛自拍,1069交友,美眉成人排行榜,av女,本土自拍,美女桌布,

Anonymous said...

top [url=http://www.001casino.com/]free casino games[/url] coincide the latest [url=http://www.casinolasvegass.com/]casino online[/url] unshackled no store reward at the foremost [url=http://www.baywatchcasino.com/]casino perk
[/url].